Integrating Defeasible Argumentation and Machine Learning Techniques
نویسندگان
چکیده
The field of machine learning (ML) is concerned with the question of how to construct algorithms that automatically improve with experience. In recent years many successful ML applications have been developed, such as datamining programs, information-filtering systems, etc. Although ML algorithms allow the detection and extraction of interesting patterns of data for several kinds of problems, most of these algorithms are based on quantitative reasoning, as they rely on training data in order to infer so-called target functions. In the last years defeasible argumentation has proven to be a sound setting to formalize common-sense qualitative reasoning. This approach can be combined with other inference techniques, such as those provided by machine learning theory. In this paper we outline different alternatives for combining defeasible argumentation and machine learning techniques. We suggest how different aspects of a generic argument-based framework can be integrated with other ML-based approaches.
منابع مشابه
On Automated Defeasible Reasoning with Controlled Natural Language and Argumentation
We present an approach to reasoning with strict and defeasible rules over literals. A controlled natural language is employed as human/machine interface to facilitate the specification of knowledge and verbalization of results. Reasoning on the rules is done by a direct semantics that addresses several issues for current approaches to argumentation-based defeasible reasoning. Techniques from fo...
متن کاملArgumentation Theory for Decision Support in Health-Care: A Comparison with Machine Learning
This study investigates role of defeasible reasoning and argumentation theory for decision-support in the health-care sector. The main objective is to support clinicians with a tool for taking plausible and rational medical decisions that can be better justified and explained. The basic principles of argumentation theory are described and demonstrated in a well known health scenario: the breast...
متن کاملdARe - Using Argumentation to Explain Conclusions from a Controlled Natural Language Knowledge Base
We present an approach to reasoning with knowledge bases comprised of strict and defeasible rules over literals. A controlled natural language is proposed as a human/machine interface to facilitate the specification of knowledge and verbalisation of results. Techniques from formal argumentation theory are employed to justify conclusions of the approach; this aims at facilitating human acceptanc...
متن کاملA defeasible reasoning model of inductive concept learning from examples and communication
This paper introduces a logical model of inductive generalization, and specifically of the machine learning task of inductive concept learning (ICL). We argue that some inductive processes, like ICL, can be seen as a form of defeasible reasoning. We define a consequence relation characterizing which hypotheses can be induced from given sets of examples, and study its properties, showing they co...
متن کاملA Distributed Argumentation Framework using Defeasible Logic Programming ( Extended Version )
Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) by García and Simari is an approach to realise non-monotonic reasoning via dialectical argumentation. We extend their approach by explicitly supporting distributed entities in the argumentation process on a structural basis. This makes the modelling of distributed argumentation systems like a jury court by using DeLP techniques possible. In this framework pos...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره cs.AI/0402057 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003